<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>TransportFool &#187; pts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://transportfool.com/tag/pts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://transportfool.com</link>
	<description>Watching the pulse of the auto transport industry</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 05 Feb 2012 05:55:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Are the teamsters being fair to their own members?</title>
		<link>http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/are-the-teamsters-being-fair-to-their-own-members/</link>
		<comments>http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/are-the-teamsters-being-fair-to-their-own-members/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Jul 2008 02:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Campbell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Allied]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankrupt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teamsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportfool.com/?p=204</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We can talk all day about whether the Allied Auto Transport drivers did right to accept a pay cut to attempt to save their jobs. There has been a lot of discussion along the same lines about the union rejecting &#8230; <a href="http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/are-the-teamsters-being-fair-to-their-own-members/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://transportfool.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/teamster-logo.jpg"><img class="alignleft size-medium wp-image-205" title="teamster-logo" src="http://transportfool.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/07/teamster-logo.jpg" alt="" width="250" height="150" /></a>We can talk all day about whether the Allied Auto Transport drivers did right to accept a pay cut to attempt to save their jobs. There has been a lot of discussion along the same lines about the union rejecting Performance Auto Transports attempt to force a similar pay cut through the bankruptcy court. The facts are that Allied is still hauling cars and paying their drivers the lower wage and PTS is closed.</p>
<p>Is my sense of fair messed up when I think it is <span style="color: #000000;">UNFAIR</span> for a driver with seniority that lost his job because he voted to strike rather than accept a pay cut to take a position at Allied, that results in either less work or possibly no work at all for a guy that has been driving for a year at Allied under the wage concessions!</p>
<p><a href="http://thecarhauler.com/2008/07/01/employers-deny-job-rights-to-pts-teamsters/#comments" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/thecarhauler.com/2008/07/01/employers-deny-job-rights-to-pts-teamsters/_comments?referer=');">This post</a> on <a href="http://thecarhauler.com/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/thecarhauler.com/?referer=');">The car hauler</a> is what set me thinking about this:</p>
<ol class="commentlist">
<li id="comment-148" class="alt"> <span style="color: #ff0000;"><cite>Active Car Hauler says:</cite><br />
<small class="commentmetadata"><a href="http://thecarhauler.com/2008/07/01/employers-deny-job-rights-to-pts-teamsters/#comment-148" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/thecarhauler.com/2008/07/01/employers-deny-job-rights-to-pts-teamsters/_comment-148?referer=');">June 21st, 2008 at 10:17 pm</a> &#8211; <a href="http://thecarhauler.com/2008/07/01/employers-deny-job-rights-to-pts-teamsters/#comments" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/thecarhauler.com/2008/07/01/employers-deny-job-rights-to-pts-teamsters/_comments?referer=');">Edit</a></small></span><span style="color: #ff0000;">If PTS workers came to work and the doors were locked I wouldnt have any arguement for their seniority rights, but this is not the case.. Allied drivers understood what would have happened if they didnt except the pay reductions, they did and their still working..PTS drivers rolled the dice and lost…now me and 40 other drivers some of who transferred cause our work was given up by the our company now face losing our jobs cause PTS drivers struck their company out of business…PTS drivers opened a can of worms…Ur former owner is still in,changing ur PTS logo to Allied as we speak, Uniited road is hauling PTS freight ,some of ur drivers who are being absorbed are looking at pay cuts. So who benefits from the strike and closure..the most senior men..and the question is asked why united road and others are taking our freight? maybe because the junior guys the future of the teamsters are dissatisfied and fed up with constantly being stepped on. But realize this, PTS went out of business while u guys struck..at that point You had no work 2 claim your own, you gave up that right ,just as u gave up the right 2 claim severence, vacation, and unemployement . The union has scrabled to force u guys down our throat but were not going 2 stand by and get stepped on cause u guys lost.. In my barn my shop steward went out on comp the day before u guys struck, that was the first sign., he wont return any active drivers call, and he has said he will not take any greveinces….see a pattern here? The teamsters is a democracy not a autonomy….Cassens and Allied have sent u 2 the bottom of their list……why isnt Active doing the same?</span></li>
</ol>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/are-the-teamsters-being-fair-to-their-own-members/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The closing of PTS is now official</title>
		<link>http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/the-closing-of-pts-is-now-official/</link>
		<comments>http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/the-closing-of-pts-is-now-official/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Jun 2008 13:39:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Campbell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bankrupt]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teamsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportfool.com/?p=162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We called it on the 11th but now ,Jeff Cornish, the CEO of Performance transportation Services has made it official on the company website. I think the teamsters are fortunate that Jeff threw in the towel and folded when he &#8230; <a href="http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/the-closing-of-pts-is-now-official/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>We called it on the 11th but now ,Jeff Cornish, the CEO of Performance transportation Services has made it official on the <a href="http://www.pts-inc.biz/home.asp" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.pts-inc.biz/home.asp?referer=');">company website</a>. I think the teamsters are fortunate that Jeff threw in the towel and folded when he did. If he would have let the strike extend several weeks then the shippers would have been forced to find non-union carriers to move the cars. Here is a copy of the letter:   <a href="http://transportfool.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/the-end-of-pts.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-163" title="the-end-of-pts" src="http://transportfool.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/the-end-of-pts.jpg" alt="performance transportation services letter to employees " width="706" height="914" /><br />
</a></p>
<p>Here is the <a href="http://www.teamster.org/08news/hn_080613_7.asp" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.teamster.org/08news/hn_080613_7.asp?referer=');">Teamsters rebuttal</a></p>
<div class="bluemenuheads" style="margin-left: 10px;">Teamsters Set Record Straight About PTS Shutdown</div>
<p><img src="http://www.teamster.org/images/spacer.gif" alt="" width="450" height="2" /><br />
<img src="http://www.teamster.org/images/tan.gif" alt="" hspace="10" width="477" height="10" /></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><strong>Lenders Pull Plug on Company</strong></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-weight: 700; font-family: Arial;"> June 10, 2008</span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">PTS announced today that it was shutting down, effective today, and Teamster carhaul negotiators are setting the record straight about the company&#8217;s demise.</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&#8220;In its announcement, PTS suggested that our failure to accept its most recent proposal led to the closure, but nothing could be further from the truth,&#8221; said Fred Zuckerman, Teamsters Carhaul Director. &#8220;We learned this afternoon that PTS permanently closed its doors after its primary lenders, Black Diamond Capital Management, cut off access to its credit facility earlier this week. The union has been on strike against PTS since Monday, June 9, 2008, in support of our bargaining demands and in protest of the company&#8217;s unfair labor practices. PTS&#8217;s top officials met with us all day yesterday to try to end the strike and to convince us to accept drastic wage concessions for our members. The company did not provide us with information that was anywhere near adequate to support its demands. The company did not present us with a viable plan to get out from underneath its debt. Instead, the company wanted to force our members to bear the lion&#8217;s share of the cuts and to shoulder a grossly disproportionate share of the ongoing risks relating to the company&#8217;s problems with its lendors. We countered with a detailed proposal to the company, which included significant operating improvements for PTS and which in our opinion would have enabled to company to survive. The company rejected our proposal and insisted only on cutting our members&#8217; wages. At the same time, though, the company&#8217;s top management would not take the same cuts for themselves. Their last-second gesture to take just a modest cut in relation to the cuts they wanted our members to take was an empty one at best. Based on the company&#8217;s actions today and reports of lock downs at the facilities, it appears the company has chosen to shut its doors rather than continue talks with the union.&#8221;</p>
<p class="MsoNormal">There is two sides to every disagreement. I think this one is no exception and both sides have valid points. I think Zuckerman loses some credibility when he says &#8220;it appears the company has chosen to shut its doors rather than continue talks with the union.&#8221; I don&#8217;t believe that PTS has any choice. They have run out of time. Creditors are pushing for chapter 7 so they can begin recovering assets.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/the-closing-of-pts-is-now-official/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The teamsters sucessfully topple Performance Transportation services</title>
		<link>http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/the-teamsters-sucessfully-topple-performance-transportation-services/</link>
		<comments>http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/the-teamsters-sucessfully-topple-performance-transportation-services/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Jun 2008 02:29:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Campbell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teamsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportfool.com/?p=157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The question is why? Well as I see it if they gave them concessions on wage to help them stay viable(profitable) they fear that others(including automakers would make the same moves next. They appear to be willing to sacrifice a &#8230; <a href="http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/the-teamsters-sucessfully-topple-performance-transportation-services/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The question is why? Well as I see it if they gave them concessions on wage to help them stay viable(profitable) they fear that others(including automakers would make the same moves next. They appear to be willing to sacrifice a company with 2000 union jobs to keep from setting a precedent. Their risk is that so many jobs may be replaced by non-union carriers that this could be the beginning of the end for the unions. If they can&#8217;t get a significant percentage of the workers employed soon then how do you think the next strike vote will go! I don&#8217;t think they should have played hard-ball in this economy. It probably would have worked 3 years ago.</p>
<p><span style="color: #339966; font-size: large;">Here is a Teamsters opinion</span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: x-small;"><span style="color: #000000;">Copied here from a comment on <a href="http://thecarhauler.com/" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/thecarhauler.com/?referer=');">thecarhauler</a></span></span> he is responding to a comment from ford focus buyer that blamed the union for loss of the PTS jobs.</p>
<ol class="commentlist">
<li id="comment-100" class="alt"> <cite>Homer50 says:</cite><br />
<small class="commentmetadata"><a href="http://thecarhauler.com/2008/06/13/pts-calls-it-quits/#comment-100" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/thecarhauler.com/2008/06/13/pts-calls-it-quits/_comment-100?referer=');">June 14th, 2008 at 10:31 am</a> &#8211; <a href="http://thecarhauler.com/2008/06/13/pts-calls-it-quits/#comments" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/thecarhauler.com/2008/06/13/pts-calls-it-quits/_comments?referer=');">Edit</a></small>Dear Ford Focus buyer, I have to disagree. Every one of us knew what we were doing right from the start. In papers that the Teamsters filed in court the day of the 15% paycut we stated we were, “Striking to put the company permanently out of business.” This company was rotten from the inside out and we weren’t gonna have another Enron type of closing here. If we were going down, and for most us employees we could see the writing on the wall, THEY WERE COMING WITH US!!! In the last few months they did everything they could to keep away anyone from getting a look at what they were doing. In court the day that they got the 15%, the second-lein holders were trying to get the court to appoint an examiner and PTS was FIGHTING IT!!!<br />
The ONLY purpose for the 15% paycut was to line their pockets with a little more cash before they finally closed the doors. If Jeff Cornish was talking he was probably lying!</li>
</ol>
<p><a href="http://transportfool.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/pts-letter.jpg"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-158" title="pts-letter" src="http://transportfool.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/pts-letter.jpg" alt="letter from jeff cornish to performance transportation services PTS employees" width="699" height="868" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/the-teamsters-sucessfully-topple-performance-transportation-services/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GM, Ford and Toyota prepare for strike against PTS</title>
		<link>http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/gm-ford-and-toyota-prepare-for-strike-against-pts/</link>
		<comments>http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/gm-ford-and-toyota-prepare-for-strike-against-pts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 13:55:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Dave Campbell</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Auto Transport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[teamsters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[union]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/gm-ford-and-toyota-prepare-for-strike-against-pts/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I think a strike of any length could be a death sentence for Performance Transportation Services. Nobody wants to break strike lines because we want to see drivers get paid fairly but in this case the strike will more likely &#8230; <a href="http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/gm-ford-and-toyota-prepare-for-strike-against-pts/">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a strike of any length could be a death sentence for Performance Transportation Services. Nobody wants to break strike lines because we want to see drivers get paid fairly but in this case the strike will more likely result in PTS folding. I think it would be better for the industry if PTS was replaced by several mid-sized companies instead of having one giant. Then if one company does not treat drivers fairly they see the drivers get hired away by the competition. No strike needed!</p>
<p><a title="pts21.jpg" href="http://transportfool.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/pts21.jpg"><img title="pts auto transport truck" src="http://transportfool.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/pts21.jpg" alt="performance transportation services pts auto-hauler" width="864" height="233" /></a></p>
<p>GM spokeswoman Deborah Silverman said the automaker &#8220;would take steps to ensure that the supply chain is not disrupted&#8221; in the event of a strike.  Ford is hopeful there will be no strike, but spokesman Todd Nissen said &#8220;we&#8217;re working on contingency plans to keep our vehicles moving away from the plants&#8221; if there is a walkout.</p>
<p>Toyota spokesman Xavier Dominicis said the company also was monitoring the dispute and preparing a plan for moving vehicles if there is a strike.</p>
<p>Here is a copy of a portion of a letter written by CEO Jeff Cornish to PTS employees</p>
<p><a title="pts1.jpg" href="http://transportfool.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/pts1.jpg"><img src="http://transportfool.com/wp-content/uploads/2008/06/pts1.jpg" alt="pts1.jpg" width="860" height="137" /></a></p>
<p>Here is a quote from an information flier on the <a href="http://www.teamster.org/08news/hn_080606_3.asp" target="_blank" onclick="pageTracker._trackPageview('/outgoing/www.teamster.org/08news/hn_080606_3.asp?referer=');">teamsters web-site:</a><br />
&#8220;We have no confidence in this company’s ability to operate under any<br />
circumstances going forward, even with one-sided wage concessions and a small<br />
bridge loan from a hedge fund in place. Even with the concessions, the company<br />
has virtually no chance for survival.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://transportfool.com/auto-transport/gm-ford-and-toyota-prepare-for-strike-against-pts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

